Springe direkt zu Inhalt

Application, advantages and disadvantages of fog harvesting

Main applications:

  • fog collectors can provide water meeting World Health Organization drinking water standards to rural communities and groups of homes; this water is inexpensive to produce and can be delivered to the homes by gravity flow
  • fog collectors can provide water for reforestation of ridge lines and the upper parts of mountains where it is impractical to import water from conventional sources; the fog water can be delivered to drip irrigation systems by gravity flow and the resulting forests, if properly situated, can become self-sustaining by directly collecting fog water. (Schemenauer 2008)

Advantages:

  • Passive collection system requiring no energy input to operate
  • Cheap and easy to maintain and repair
  • Water quality is generally good in non-industrial areas, though pH can often be low
  • Modular system that can grow in line with demand or available funds
  • Quick and simple design and construction. Installation requires little time or skill
  • Low capital investment and other costs compared to conventional sources of potable water in mountainous and arid areas

Disadvantages:

  • Technology requires very specific climatologic and topographic conditions. Yield is difficult to predict so a thorough pilot project is required in every case
  • Yield is very sensitive to changes in climate conditions and so a back-up supply is required
  • Fog collection is unlikely to be of regional or national importance as a water supply. Emphasis is on the local level which requires full community participation
  • If the collectors are not close to the point of use then the cost of the pipeline can make the system uneconomic and hydraulically difficult
  • Vulnerability to vandalism
  • Good access to the site is required for installation, maintenance and monitoring

(Furey 1998)